EXPERIENCE

Experience as arbitrator includes acting as:

 

ICC

 

• Sole Arbitrator in an ICC arbitration involving a contract in the sector of pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and life sciences (Munich seat, German law)

• President in an ICC arbitration involving a concession agreement (Singapore seat, Cambodian law)

• President in an ICC arbitration involving a construction dispute (Singapore seat, Vietnamese and Singapore law)

• President in an ICC arbitration involving an agency agreement (Singapore seat, Kuwaiti law)

• President in an ICC arbitration involving a dispute over a power-purchase agreement (Lahore seat, Pakistani law)

• President in an ICC arbitration involving a loan agreement (Singapore seat, Cambodian law)

• Co-arbitrator in an ICC arbitration involving a dispute arising from a construction project (Singapore seat, Myanmar law)

• Emergency arbitrator in an ICC arbitration involving a long-term LNG SPA (Singapore seat, Singapore law)

• Sole arbitrator in an ICC arbitration involving a dispute arising out of a sale and purchase agreement for shares in a group of companies (Singapore seat, Indonesian law)

• Emergency arbitrator in an ICC arbitration involving a construction project (Singapore seat, Argentinian law)

 

SIAC

 

• Sole arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving a marketing and operations agreement governed (Singapore seat, Indonesian law)

• Sole arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving a Coal Supply and Purchase Agreement (Singapore seat, English law)

• Emergency arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving a non-competition agreement between an employee and their former employer (Singapore seat, New York law)

• Emergency arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving a solar farm dispute (Singapore seat, Indian law)

• Sole Arbitrator in a SIAC arbitration involving a contract for the sale of coke (Singapore seat, CISG)

• Sole arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving a share subscription agreement (Singapore seat, Singapore law)

• Sole arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving a construction dispute (Singapore seat, Singapore law)

• Sole Arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving the sale of underwater trenching equipment (Singapore seat, English law)

• Sole arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving a marketing and operations agreement (Singapore seat, Singapore law)

• Sole arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving a charterparty (Singapore seat, Singapore law)

• Sole arbitrator in an SIAC arbitration involving a dispute arising out of a share purchase agreement (Singapore seat, Indonesian law)

​

Other

 

• Sole Arbitrator in a KCAB arbitration involving a distribution agreement (Seoul seat, Korean law)

• President in a JCAA arbitration involving a contract for the development of a digital multimedia receiver for worldwide distribution (Tokyo seat, Japanese law)

• Sole Arbitrator in an expedited KCAB arbitration involving a contract for an international sale of goods (Seoul seat, Korean law)

• Co-arbitrator in an HKIAC arbitration involving a technology contract (Hong Kong seat, Hong Kong law)

​

Experience as tribunal secretary includes acting in:

 

• The ICSID arbitration Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24

• An ICC arbitration involving a construction dispute (Seoul seat, Korean law)

• An SIAC arbitration involving a shareholders’ agreement (Singapore seat, Dutch law)

• An SIAC arbitration involving a land purchase agreement (Singapore seat, Indonesian law)

• Two SIAC arbitrations involving shareholders agreements (Singapore seat, Singapore law)

• An LCIA arbitration concerning a tax dispute (London seat, Belize law)

• An UNCITRAL Rules arbitration involving a joint operating agreement (Paris seat, English law)

 

Experience as counsel includes representing:

 

• The investor in Oxus Gold v. Kyrgyzstan, an LCIA-administered arbitration brought under the Kyrgyzstan - United Kingdom BIT (international and Kyrgyz law)

• Respondent in parallel German and ICC arbitrations concerning the dissolution of a joint venture on the Iberian Peninsula (Spanish law)

• The investor in GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft v. Ukraine, an ICSID arbitration brought under the Germany - Ukraine BIT (international and Ukrainian law)

• Respondent in an ICC arbitration concerning a telecommunications project on the high seas (Finnish law)

• The investor in The Rompetrol Group N.V. v. Romania, an ICSID arbitration brought under the Netherlands - Romania BIT (international and Romanian law)

• Respondent in an ICC arbitration concerning a large-scale construction project in Bulgaria (Bulgarian law)